September 18, 2006 12:01 AM / Since you asked

Yee-fucking-haw!

Today I had the shitgiggles-deskdance honor of having a piece of writing posted on the Great Dennis Cooper's blog. Dennis is hugely generous with that coveted space he captains, and he frequently allows his readers to 'curate'/write blog posts on specific topics- pieces that Dennis calls 'Days'. For example, Australian Music Day, Werner Herzog Day, and Derek Jarman Day have been some recent [and super] reader contributions.

So mine is called 'Fucking Poets: A Day for Research Chemicals'. It details the Research Chem phenomenon from roughly 1999-2004. If you don't know what Research Chemicals are, they're a subset of 'designer drugs'. They're not particularly chemically related as a whole, but they're grouped together because they all enjoyed faddish internet popularity around the same time.

The idea of crafting a Day for Research Chemicals arose when I happened to mention, on Dennis' blog, that I took some 2ci at Matthew Barney's recent Drawing Restraint retrospective at SFMOMA [which, by the way, is where I first saw Barney's Hypertrophy, which, by the way, effectively shattered my brainscape with its genius sloganeering and absurdly sexual fascination with Harry Houdini- given, of course, the particular character of my brainscape at the moment I happened to walk near the wall where said piece was hanging].

So yeah: Dennis returned that he'd never heard of 2ci and asked for more information. Aside, perhaps, from 5-meo-dmt and 2ct7, 2ci struck-and-strikes me as the most famous Research Chemical- at the very least, it's in the top 5. I thought hmm: if you don't know 2ci, I guess you probably don't know Research Chemicals? As any reader of his non- and fiction knows, Dennis Cooper is no stranger to obscure drugs or internet sensations, so I was surprised that the grand tale of Research Chemicals hadn't yet made its way to him. While the Research Chemical phenomenon has never been one of 'my stories', I was certainly there when everything happened; I feel like I remember the events with reasonable clarity; and, on several in-person occasions, I've done my best to explain the whole deal to flabbergasted strangers. Mostly while hosteling.

As I went about writing the Day, the appellation 'Research Chemical' grew rapidly comic, because I had a pisspants-difficult time conducting any real 'research'. There's Erowid.org [one of the Great websites, period, on any topic], Mdma.net, Bluelight.ru, Good Old Google, and, kinda, not much else. Naturally, 'trip reports'- accounts of what it's like to be on these drugs- abound. But I was trying to tell the story of an industry boom, the rapid expansion and subsequent contraction of a particular scene. About each individual substance involved, an entire book could be written to detail effects, dosages, common uses, locales of popularity, and so on.

To make a long story this: I did my best to read everything I could, but I largely wrote the Day from memory, and from some notes I took in the early 00s while the whole thing was on.

Thus this post. If I made errors, neglected interesting or important tidbits, or really whatever, here's a place to enlighten me and others. It's also a place for general discussion, q+a, speculations, attractive myths, really whatever; about the Research Chem boom, the drugs involved, related substances, Etc Etc Etc Nothing's Off Limits. So please: fire away. Like I said, 'trip reports' were basically outside the scope of the particular article I wrote, but if you'd like to leave a brief note or extended treatise regarding your personal experience[s] with these [or related] chemicals, I'd be honored to read whatever you have to say, not to mention very excited to engage with you.

Here's Fucking Poets: A Day for Research Chemicals, archived here at pleasureiseasy.info for ease of reading.

Here's the Day at Dennis Cooper's. It's the same text. If you're reading the piece over at Dennis Cooper's, to continue the article after the first section, click the text in the 'Previous Posts' sidebar- 'So, somebody somewhere set up some labs?', then 'Rolling Stone published an article', and so on. [Dennis' readers obviously know how to navigate his blog already, but not everyone who surfs here reads Dennis' blog. I know, I know- too bad for them.]

If you're so inclined, you can also read some initial comments on Research Chem Day from Dennis Cooper's readers by navigating to the Previous Post beginning 'p.s. Jesus fucking christ, there's more than 140'. Needless to say!, however!, there's no prerequisite to read that before posting anything here.

Ok. Floor's open; your blank box awaits.

file under; writ
link is http://pleasureiseasy.info/2006/09/since_you_asked.html
4 have made it up below

September 19, 2006 3:29 AM

ignacio writes,

I'm not sure I agree with you about "love" (or romantic infatuation) endangering one in any way like hallucingenic chemicals do -- or may -- even if as a rhetorical device it's certainly often true to allege that one's inner demons will be exposed.

some of us work hard to keep these inner demons from coming out. (and heroin for instance may help sometimes in certain cases.)

sigmar polke has a painting entitled (something like): "Demons command paint upper left hand corner BLACK"

and he obeyed.

September 19, 2006 4:06 AM

math writes,

ignacio, hey. i will respond to your email for sure, just give me a little time to process, etc.

for me, love is a relatively apt comparison. Tripping is not so different from Falling. 'endangering'... well, hm, people do all kinds of stupid shit in the name of love, from suicide to absurdly life-wrecking manouevres. clearly, there are very basic differences: love doesn't usually make you hallucinate visually, and you surely can't 'overdose' on love in the same way you can literally kill yourself with a drug. but, love, earnest and devoutly felt love- when simply framed as another experience that's intense-to-say-the-least, and that will probably transform you into a new person unable to recognize your former self- it seems quite servicable to me as a comparison. there's terror in love because, like ingesting powerful drugs, it is an act of giving yourself up and giving yourself over. bah, who to cite... Mann, Death In Venice?

to drop the language into slightly more pop vocabulary: i've met far more people whose lives have been Well+Truly Fucked from [their particular] romantic relationships, than i have met people whose lives have been Well+Truly Fucked by psychedelic drugs.

i certainly agree that all psychedelic experiences should be approached with great care, guileless curiosity, love for the world, and [DUH] complete openness. that's How To Do It, for sure.

that said, i think the whole idea of hallucinogens sort of... inducing a confrontation with personal demons?... is kind of overblown. you [not ignacio-you, but everybody-you] can sure as hell confront your demons on most hallucinogens if you want to. but the idea of being ambushed by your greatest fears with zero warning... i more get the feeling, kinda, such people need/want to deal with their demons and psychedelics help them, perhaps unexpectedly. the unexpected character, when present, can prove a bit of a shock.

in addition to love [by which i guess i mean an intense romantic relationship of some kind, not exactly 'infatuation' though], i posit a few other activities that can, potentially, fuck your mind just as hard+deep as, potentially, the most intense hallucinogens can also:

-extended travel in a country that is truly foreign to you
-experiencing a Formative Work of Art [in any media]- you know, the ones that Change Everything
-prison
-war/combat
-meeting one of your heroes

the list goes on... but just from my perspective, yeah these crazy drugs blow your mind... as do many other things.

the Polke title is good, i love those kinds of titles that are terse yet verbose.

xo, math+

February 19, 2007 9:23 PM

Martel writes,

Who were you, back in those days?

Ever hang out on IRC or in a.d.p. or on the RCML?

I've been way out of contact for the last 6 years and it would be great to get back in touch with some of you.

February 20, 2007 12:17 AM

math writes,

i wasn't known in the scene; i was a pretty quiet participant and observer. i dunno, i like to be as legally careful as possible.

nope, never hung out on IRC, and i have no idea what the other 2 things are. i used to post on Bluelight sometimes if that name rings any bells.

feel free to email me totally anytime, though. we could make each other's acquaintance.

xo, math+

leave your fingerprints

tags allowed:
strong - em - b - i - u - blockquote
p - br - ul - li - a href - img src